tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16312577964375601032024-03-06T08:18:33.988+02:00sartek blogjaEukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comBlogger27125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-34034048217758843572010-09-29T21:32:00.000+03:002010-09-29T21:32:33.600+03:00Megasztár vs X-FaktorMegasztárEukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-32915188735746342442010-06-05T17:29:00.001+03:002011-04-29T23:24:50.140+03:00A Closer Look at ZFS, Vdevs and Performance<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConstantThinking/~3/fy7DOMcmWWs/closer-look-zfs-vdevs-and-performance">A Closer Look at ZFS, Vdevs and Performance</a>: "<br />
<div><div style="width: 320px;"><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/image/vdevsjpg"><img alt="vdevs.jpg" height="240" src="http://constantin.glez.de/sites/constantin.glez.de/files/images/vdevs.blog.jpg" title="vdevs.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><br />
</div>When looking at the mails and comments I get about my <a href="http://constantin.glez.de/blog/2010/04/ten-ways-easily-improve-oracle-solaris-zfs-filesystem-performance">ZFS optimization</a><br />
<br />
and my <a href="http://constantin.glez.de/blog/2010/01/home-server-raid-greed-and-why-mirroring-still-best">RAID-Greed</a> posts, the same type of questions tend to pop up over and over again. Here's an example from a reader email:<br />
<br />
<cite><br />
<br />
'I was reading about ZFS on your blog and you mention that if I do a 6 drive array for example, and a single RAID-Z the speed of the slowest drive is the maximum I will be able to achieve, now I thought that ZFS would be better in terms of speed. Please let me know if there is a newer ZFS version that improved this or if it does not apply anymore.'<br />
<br />
</cite><br />
<br />
This is just an example, but the basic theme is the same for much for the reactions I see: Many people think that RAID-Z will give them always good performance and are surprised that it doesn't, thinking it's a software or a ZFS issue.<br />
<br />
In reality, it's just pure logic and physics, and to understand that we should look a little closer at what <em>vdevs</em> are in ZFS and how they work.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
<br />
<h3>What is a Vdev?</h3><br />
Another reader pointed out that I should define <em>vdevs</em> as short and simple as possible, so here we go:<br />
<br />
A ZFS <em>vdev</em> (aka 'virtual device') is either:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>a single disk, or</li>
<li>two or more disks that are mirrored, or</li>
<li>a group of disks that are organized using RAID-Z.</li>
</ul><br />
There are also special kinds of vdevs like hot-spares, ZIL or cache devices, etc. but we'll leave that to another post. Look up the full definition in the <a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5166/zpool-1m">zpool (1M)</a> man page.<br />
<br />
So there you have it: A disk, a mirror or a RAID-Z group.<br />
<br />
A ZFS <em>pool</em> is always a stripe of one or more <em>vdevs</em> that supplies blocks for your ZFS file systems to store data in.<br />
<br />
<h3>Vdev examples</h3><br />
The following typical command creates a new pool out of one vdev which is a mirror of two disks:<br />
<br />
<div><br />
<pre>zpool create tank1 mirror c0t0d0 c0t1d0</pre></div><br />
And this example creates a new pool out of two vdevs that are RAID-Z groups with 2 data disks and one parity disk each:<br />
<br />
<div><br />
<pre>zpool create tank2 raidz c0t0d0 c0t1d0 c0t2d0 raidz c0t3d0 c0t4d0 c0t5d0</pre></div><br />
And when you decide to grow your pool, you just add one or more vdevs to it:<br />
<br />
<div><br />
<pre>zpool add tank1 mirror c0t2d0 c0t3d0
zpool add tank2 raidz c0t6d0 c0t7d0 c0t8d0</pre></div><br />
You see: Whenever the keywords '<code>mirror</code>', '<code>raidz</code>', '<code>raidz2</code>', '<code>raidz3</code>' etc. show up in a <code>zpool</code> command, a new <em>vdev</em> is created out of the disks that follow the keyword.<br />
<br />
And in all cases, a ZFS pool is always a stripe of vdevs, no matter what.<br />
<br />
Since a vdev can be three different things, let's look at them in more detail:<br />
<br />
<h3>Single Disks</h3><br />
The simplest of vdevs is a single disk. Not much to say here other than whenever we say 'disk', it could be a physical disk, an SSD, a LUN in a SAN, a USB stick or even a simple file sitting on another filesystem (useful for testing and demo purposes): Anything that looks like a block device in Solaris can be used as a 'disk' in vdevs.<br />
<br />
Single disks don't offer any protection: If you lose a vdev that is a single disk, all data on it is lost.<br />
<br />
Single disks also don't offer any special performance characteristics, you'll get the IOPS and bandwidth that the physics of the disk gives you, not more, not less.<br />
<br />
The other vdev types combine single disks into groups of disks:<br />
<br />
<h3>Mirrors</h3><br />
ZFS mirrored vdevs function similarly to traditional mirrors: Two or more disks can form a mirror and data is replicated across them in an identical fashion.<br />
<br />
If you have a mirror vdev with <em>n</em> disks, you can lose <em>n-1</em> disks and ZFS will still be able to recover all data from this vdev. Same as with RAID controllers or traditional volume managers.<br />
<br />
But ZFS can do even more: If any block is corrupted and the hardware didn't notice (aka silent block errors), ZFS will still detect the error (through the block's checksum) and correct it using the other disk's copy of the block (assuming it was stored correctly).<br />
<br />
This works even if <em>both</em> halfs of the mirror are affected by data corruption, as long as for any given block there is at least one disk in the mirror group that carries the correct version of that block.<br />
<br />
Mirrors in ZFS are always more robust than mirrors in traditional RAID systems.<br />
<br />
<h3>Mirrored Performance Considerations</h3><br />
When writing to mirrored vdevs, ZFS will write in parallel to all of the mirror disks at once and return from the write operation when <em>all of the individual disks have finished writing</em>. This means that for writes, each mirrored vdev will have the same performance as its slowest disk. This is true for both IOPS (number of IO operations per second) and bandwidth (MB/s).<br />
<br />
When reading from mirrored vdevs, ZFS will read blocks off the mirror's individual disks in a round-robin fashion, thereby increasing both IOPS and bandwidth performance: You'll get the combined aggregate IOPS and bandwidth performance of all disks.<br />
<br />
But from the point of view of a single application that issues a single write or read IO, then waits until it is complete, the time it will take will be the same for a mirrored vdev as for a single disk: Eventually it has to travel down one disk's path, there's no shortcut for that.<br />
<br />
<h3>RAID-Z</h3><br />
RAID-Z vdevs are a variant of RAID-5 and RAID-6 with interesting properties:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>You can choose the number of data disks and the number of parity disks. Today, the number of parity disks is limited to 3, but this may become larger in the future.</li>
<li>Each data block that is handed over to ZFS is split up into its own stripe of multiple disk blocks at the disk level, across the RAID-Z vdev. This is important to keep in mind: Each individual I/O operation at the filesystem level will be mapped to multiple, parallel and smaller I/O operations across members of the RAID-Z vdev.</li>
<li>When writing to a RAID-Z vdev, ZFS may choose to use less than the maximum number of data disks. For example, you may be using a 3+2 (5 disks) RAID-Z2 vdev, but ZFS may choose to write a block as 2+2 because it fits better.</li>
<li>Write transactions in ZFS are always atomic, even when using RAID-Z: Each write operation is only finished if the überblock has been successfully written to disk. This means there's no possibility to suffer from the traditional RAID-5 write hole, in which a power-failure can cause a partially (and therefore broken) written RAID-5 set of blocks.</li>
<li>Due to the copy-on-write nature of ZFS, there's no read-modify-write cycle for changing blocks on disk: ZFS writes are always full stripe writes to free blocks. This allows ZFS to choose blocks that are in sequence on the disk, essentially turning random writes into sequential writes, maximizing disk write capabilities.</li>
<li>Since all writes are atomic and since they naturally map to sequential writes, there's no need for a RAID-Z with battery backed-up cache: There's no possibility to have an inconsistent state on disk and ZFS already writes at maximum disk write speed. This saves money and lets you leverage cheap disks.</li>
</ul><br />
Just like traditional RAID-5, you can lose up to the number of parity disks without losing any data. And just like ZFS mirroring, for each block at the filesystem level, ZFS can try to reconstruct data out of partially working disks, as long as it can find a critical number of blocks to reconstruct the original RAID-Z group with.<br />
<br />
ZFS RAID-Z is always better than RAID-5, RAID-6 or other RAID-schemes on traditional RAID controllers.<br />
<br />
<h3>RAID-Z Performance Considerations</h3><br />
When writing to RAID-Z vdevs, each filesystem block is split up into its own stripe across (potentially) all devices of the RAID-Z vdev. This means that each write I/O will have to wait until all disks in the RAID-Z vdev are finished writing. Therefore, from the point of view of a single application waiting for its IO to complete, you'll get the <em>IOPS write performance</em> of the slowest disk in the RAID-Z vdev.<br />
<br />
Granted: A large IO may be broken down into smaller IOs across the data disks and they'll take less time to complete. But the seek time of the disk outweighs the actual write time, so the size of the IO is not of much significance.<br />
<br />
For write <em>bandwidth</em>, you may get more: Large blocks at the file system level are split into smaller blocks at the disk level that are written in parallel across the vdev's individual data disks and therefore you may get up to n times an individual disk's bandwidth for an n+m type RAID-Z vdev.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, in practice, the cases where performance matters most (mail servers, file servers, iSCSI storage for virtualization, database servers) also happen to be the cases that care a lot about IOPS performance, not much bandwidth performance.<br />
<br />
When <em>reading</em> from RAID-Z vdevs, the same rules apply, as the process is essentially reversed (no round robin shortcut like in the mirroring case): Better bandwidth if you're lucky (and read the same way as you've written) and a single disk's IOPS read performance in the majority of cases that matter.<br />
<br />
I hope that it's now starting to become apparent why copying a single large file from one directory to another is not a realistic way to measure performance, if ultimately one is interested in delivering storage to a virtualization server over NFS or iSCSI :).<br />
<br />
<h3>Vdev Performance Summary</h3><br />
Mirrored vdevs outperform RAID-Z vdevs in all cases that matter.<br />
<br />
The only case where RAID-Z performance can beat mirrored performance for the same number of disks is when you look at sequential bandwidth. Good for a tape-replacement archive, but not exactly the majority of real-world performance situations.<br />
<br />
Is that all there is to say about performance? No! Vdevs are only the beginning:<br />
<br />
<h3>Putting Vdevs Together</h3><br />
ZFS pools are always created out of <em>one or more</em> vdevs. When using more than one vdev, they're always striped.<br />
<br />
Striping is good: ZFS will send reads and writes down to all the vdevs in parallel, maximizing throughput whenever it can.<br />
<br />
Simply said: The more vdevs you stripe together, the faster your pool becomes in terms of aggregate bandwidth and aggregate IOPS, for both reads and writes.<br />
<br />
Notice the caveat involved in the little word 'aggregate': Your single little app waiting for its single IO to finish won't see a shorter wait time if your pool has many vdevs, because it'll get assigned only one of them. <br />
<br />
'Aggregate' means here that the server as a whole will be able to sustain a higher load of IOPS and bandwidth altogether, across multiple parallel IO streams when using a pool with many vdevs.<br />
<br />
How much higher? For <em>n</em> vdevs that make up your pool, it will be able to deliver <em>n</em> times the IOPS and <em>n</em> times the bandwidth of a single vdev (assuming all are equal etc.).<br />
<br />
<h3>Theory vs. Pratice</h3><br />
Now all of this is just theory. It's based on logical considerations on the way ZFS handles data to and from disks, so it tells you what performance to expect in the worst case, which typically means lots of random read or write IO operations.<br />
<br />
If you want the raw, unfiltered practical data up to ms and rpm, check Richard Elling's excellent post <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/relling/entry/zfs_raid_recommendations_space_performance">ZFS RAID recommendations: space, performance, and MTTDL</a>. Lots of good, foundational stuff.<br />
<br />
In practice, you'll almost always see better numbers, because of many possible reasons:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>You were lucky because the disk head happened to have been near the position it needed to be.</li>
<li>You were lucky and your app uses large IOs that were split up into multiple smaller IOs by the system which could be handled in parallel.</li>
<li>You were lucky and your app uses some portion of asynchronous IO operations so the system could take advantage of caching and other optimizations that rely on async IO.</li>
<li>You were lucky and your app's performance is more dependent on disk bandwidth than latency.</li>
<li>You were lucky and your app has a bottleneck elsewhere.</li>
<li>You're benchmarking your ZFS pool in a way that has nothing to do with real-world performance.</li>
</ul><br />
So, if you see better numbers, be thankful for your luck. If it's because of the last case, use a more realistic approach to measure your disk performance.<br />
<br />
<h3>The Fastest Vdev</h3><br />
So if you have a number <em>n</em> of disks to create a single vdev with, what would be the fastest vdev?<br />
<br />
This one is tricky. For writes, the situation is as follows:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Mirroring <em>n</em> disks will give you a single disk's IOPS and bandwidth performance.</li>
<li>RAID-Z with one parity drive will give you a single disk's IOPS performance, but <em>n-1</em> times aggregate bandwidth of a single disk.</li>
</ul><br />
Does it make RAID-Z the winner? Let's check reads:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Mirroring <em>n</em> disks will give you <em>n</em> times a single disk's IOPS and bandwidth read performance. And on top, each disk gets to position its head independently of the others, which will help <em>random</em> read performance for both IOPS and bandwidth.</li>
<li>RAID-Z would still give you a single disk's performance for IOPS, but <em>n-1</em> times aggregate bandwidth of a single disk. This time, though, the reads need to be correlated, because ZFS can only read <em>groups</em> of blocks across the disks that are supposed to hang out together. Good for sequential reads, bad for random reads.</li>
</ul><br />
Assuming a workload that cares about both reads and writes, and assuming that when the going gets tough, IOPS is more important than bandwidth, I'd opt for mirroring whenever I can.<br />
<br />
<h3>Keeping the Cake and Eating it Too</h3><br />
So is that it? Is there no way to make IOPS faster than a single disk?<br />
<br />
There is, if you don't use regular disks.<br />
<br />
The place where write performance hurts most is typically where the application is writing in single blocks in synchronous mode:<br />
<br />
<ol><li>The app sends the block down the ZFS pipe using <a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5167/write-2"><code>write(2)</code></a>, waiting for the system call to finish.</li>
<li>ZFS sends the block to its ZIL structure on the disk.</li>
<li>The disk positions its head to write the block, then writes it. This takes a few milliseconds: About half a rotation of its head on average. In the case of a very fast 15,000 rpm disk, this is 2 ms, or 4 Million CPU cycles of a typical 2 GHz CPU.</li>
<li>After writing the block, the disk reports success to the driver, ZFS finishes the <code>write(2)</code> call and the application continues its thing.</li>
<li>During the next pool update, ZFS writes the data again, this time to the regular pool structure, then discards the ZIL data.</li>
<li>In the event of a power loss, ZFS will replay the ZIL data into the pool structure as soon as it imports the pool, so data on the ZIL is always as safe as if it was written to the pool already.</li>
</ol><br />
The longest part is taken up by the disk drive positioning its head. Even though ZFS optimizes synchronous writes by writing them to a special ZIL structure on disk (instead of going through the whole ZFS on-disk pool update procedure), it still needs to wait for the disk to complete the transaction.<br />
<br />
The only way to accelerate that is to use a faster disk. A much faster disk, an SSD.<br />
<br />
Because if you assign an SSD as a ZIL to your ZFS pool, the following happens:<br />
<br />
<ol><li>The app sends the block down the ZFS pipe using <a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5167/write-2"><code>write(2)</code></a>, waiting for the system call to finish.</li>
<li>ZFS sends the block to its ZIL structure on the <em>SSD</em>.</li>
<li>The SSD <em>doesn't need to position anything</em>. It just writes the data into flash memory. Granted, flash is not the fastest memory, but it is much cheaper than RAM and it's still about 100x faster than a disk. Now your program only needs to wait about 40,000 CPU cycles.</li>
<li>After writing the block, the disk reports success to the driver, ZFS finishes the <code>write(2)</code> call and the application continues its thing.</li>
<li>Pool update and ZIL replaying works the same as described above</li>
</ol><br />
That's why SSDs are becoming so popular, especially with ZFS.<br />
<br />
<h3>Conclusion</h3><br />
A ZFS vdev is either a single disk, a mirror or a RAID-Z group.<br />
<br />
RAID performance can be tricky, independently of the file system. ZFS does its best to optimize, but ultimately it comes down to disk latency (seek time, rotation speed, etc.) for the cases where performance becomes critical.<br />
<br />
Mirrors are almost always faster than RAID-Z groups, especially for the cases that are interesting to databases, fileservers etc.<br />
<br />
The best way to accelerate your ZFS pool is to use SSDs.<br />
<br />
<h3>Your Turn</h3><br />
What are your experiences with ZFS and/or RAID performance? How did you measure it? What kind of applications do you use and with what ZFS setups? Share your experience in the comment section below!<br />
<br />
<div><br />
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?a=fy7DOMcmWWs:_F5KH-GjiBI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?i=fy7DOMcmWWs:_F5KH-GjiBI:F7zBnMyn0Lo" /></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?a=fy7DOMcmWWs:_F5KH-GjiBI:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?i=fy7DOMcmWWs:_F5KH-GjiBI:V_sGLiPBpWU" /></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?a=fy7DOMcmWWs:_F5KH-GjiBI:qj6IDK7rITs"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?d=qj6IDK7rITs" /></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?a=fy7DOMcmWWs:_F5KH-GjiBI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?i=fy7DOMcmWWs:_F5KH-GjiBI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" /></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?a=fy7DOMcmWWs:_F5KH-GjiBI:I9og5sOYxJI"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?d=I9og5sOYxJI" /></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?a=fy7DOMcmWWs:_F5KH-GjiBI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ConstantThinking?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" /></a></div><img height="1" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ConstantThinking/~4/fy7DOMcmWWs" width="1" />"Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-62705308322571178862010-04-24T21:29:00.001+03:002010-04-24T21:31:06.597+03:00Válasszuk ki együtt, ki koncertezzen az idei PMN-en.<a href="http://www.szatmar.ro/index.php?p=news&act=show&cid=30835">Válasszuk ki együtt, ki koncertezzen az idei PMN-en.</a>: "Döntsük el együtt, ki koncertezzen a PMN-en!"<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>EDDARA SZAVAZNI</b>Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-79085365619055101892009-10-07T16:21:00.000+03:002009-10-07T16:21:41.374+03:00Ár címke a sörönMiért teszik oda az ár <span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">címkét ahova más a pofáját teszi?</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirlo7MyfJXPFB9m2gaKEzy2dLr3MBIZYXZsVkKY1i0UDeAq4fOAt6LnQnPN8sH7MfakabpO2SxKxhxiL2tU9TTc7Q7oyna5r9Xy4eX5lg-5JzVeglPXz8N2q6sPHtZNUUwVyUwB7ALIdk/s1600-h/DSC00105.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirlo7MyfJXPFB9m2gaKEzy2dLr3MBIZYXZsVkKY1i0UDeAq4fOAt6LnQnPN8sH7MfakabpO2SxKxhxiL2tU9TTc7Q7oyna5r9Xy4eX5lg-5JzVeglPXz8N2q6sPHtZNUUwVyUwB7ALIdk/s320/DSC00105.JPG" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirlo7MyfJXPFB9m2gaKEzy2dLr3MBIZYXZsVkKY1i0UDeAq4fOAt6LnQnPN8sH7MfakabpO2SxKxhxiL2tU9TTc7Q7oyna5r9Xy4eX5lg-5JzVeglPXz8N2q6sPHtZNUUwVyUwB7ALIdk/s1600-h/DSC00105.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a><br />
</div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><br />
</span>Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-64734598681230215412009-09-18T01:18:00.003+03:002009-09-18T01:21:26.947+03:00Legyen Ön is Milliomos .. Fábry Sándorral<div class="separator" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: center;"><img border="0" src="http://www.rtlklub.hu/items/images/content/channel_logos/1979.jpg" /></div><br />
<br />
Újraindult a Legyen Ön is Millimos Fábry Sándorral az RTL Klubon.<br />
<br />
Mindent összevetve: máskor is valoszinü meg fogom nezni, <i>természetesen </i>nem a sztárok miatt... és nem is Fábry miatt.<br />
<br />
<div class="" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://www.slager.hu/video_kulso.php?ezt=381" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.slager.hu/video/videokep/381.jpg" /></a>Fábry már kicsit unalmas a sokszor ellőtt <i>poénjaival</i>, erröl már Fridi is beszélt egyszer a bumerángba.. (ö akkor az Esti Showderre célozva), itt meglehet nezni:<br />
<br />
A legnagyobb baj már az ilyen jellegü celebes műsorokkal az hogy túl vannak játszva, de a legnagyobb probléma amikor direkt idiotakat hívnak meg (lásd: marika, kiszel, pako, etc).Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-23433274275023787132009-09-02T20:07:00.000+03:002009-09-02T20:07:59.385+03:00Párbaj és Celebműszak<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://tv2.hu/Root/System/Skins/TV2Skin/img/parbaj.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a><a href="http://tv2.hu/Root/System/Skins/TV2Skin/img/parbaj.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a><a href="http://tv2.hu/Root/System/Skins/TV2Skin/img/parbaj.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a><a href="http://tv2.hu/Root/System/Skins/TV2Skin/img/parbaj.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://tv2.hu/Root/System/Skins/TV2Skin/img/parbaj.png" /></a><a href="http://tv2.hu/Root/System/Skins/TV2Skin/img/celebmuszak.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://tv2.hu/Root/System/Skins/TV2Skin/img/celebmuszak.png" /></a></div><br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">TV2 őszi első két dobása a <a href="http://tv2.hu/Nyitooldal/Musoraink/Parbaj">Párbaj</a> és a <a href="http://tv2.hu/Nyitooldal/Musoraink/Celebmuszak">Celebműszak</a></div><div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div><div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Párbaj: az nem tetszik benne hogy túl sok benne a "reality" több kérdés kevesebb "izgalom" jobban tetszene<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Celebműszak: a héten Ganxsta Zolee, Szöke András és Balázs Klári. Nem lepődünk meg amikor megláttuk hogy Szöke tulzásokba fog esni, kicsit Klárikám is ilyen de Zolee elég jó. szal összessegebe eleg jo müsor. Legalábbis amig nem lesz unalmas.Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-84924947345865370632009-08-19T01:00:00.001+03:002009-08-19T01:02:59.022+03:00bajnokok ligaja premier @ tv2nem tudom hogy miert, hogy kerult at a bajnokok ligaja kozvetitese a <a href="http://bl.tv2.hu" target="_blank">tv2re</a> de<br /><br />jo munkat vegeztek<br /><br />a legfontosabb pozitivum szerintem az volt hogy nem sitettek.. ellentetbe a masik kereskedelni csatornaval.. megszokhattuk forma 1 nel, boxnal, stb hogy sietnek meg a kommentatorok se mondhatjak el a velemenyuket --- nem beszelve interjukrol.<br /><br /><br /><br />tv2 ezzel sokat lepett elore.<br /><br />mar csak azok a nagy jelek ne lennenek sokszor a kepernyon.Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-50363251447340255962009-06-09T10:41:00.001+03:002009-06-09T10:43:04.728+03:00pictures before Maria Geronazzo's surgery(ies)Some pictures before Maria Geronazzo's surgery(ies):<br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhe2veXiorhB7ZJqBEIc_o9M7sPyuUMPJqEEfVojVogPj1Q3ihAL6btQmzIQpFo5gM2jXvHspQA6b81y567bYJrS6n6ykciiSEcYQJPY8kcHuZldVNjyB4A3cYPV1OEBfeYR0kByXxnrCI/s1600-h/mg0.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhe2veXiorhB7ZJqBEIc_o9M7sPyuUMPJqEEfVojVogPj1Q3ihAL6btQmzIQpFo5gM2jXvHspQA6b81y567bYJrS6n6ykciiSEcYQJPY8kcHuZldVNjyB4A3cYPV1OEBfeYR0kByXxnrCI/s320/mg0.png" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjy3o8-XPp0LXWNab0tVo9fajBLJw0jdODki-psTy8cA76mMEFb0j3ssICZBrfWQk9X3AzBZqFp509jbwFiSZIXmCtiJfyC4pJ1pmS1k3VPLCX8a3MUuOI3_zgd6mdumyQ95dSd15qMhYw/s1600-h/mg1.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjy3o8-XPp0LXWNab0tVo9fajBLJw0jdODki-psTy8cA76mMEFb0j3ssICZBrfWQk9X3AzBZqFp509jbwFiSZIXmCtiJfyC4pJ1pmS1k3VPLCX8a3MUuOI3_zgd6mdumyQ95dSd15qMhYw/s320/mg1.png" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgynQaDM3hQCO7QhrTH7eResX_XKU9z97lIdXG5DroOfI9168Z9MEhYD5oL8UTdhtuXMn8Rcspslr2ibmgti38AKPz_meo6F1oW9iZoijt_UlxQgHsEX8CMIwR8wk3rBeaGXexwRo1Y7cE/s1600-h/mg2.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgynQaDM3hQCO7QhrTH7eResX_XKU9z97lIdXG5DroOfI9168Z9MEhYD5oL8UTdhtuXMn8Rcspslr2ibmgti38AKPz_meo6F1oW9iZoijt_UlxQgHsEX8CMIwR8wk3rBeaGXexwRo1Y7cE/s320/mg2.png" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibobUTe5R9eHVpH7REkvJOVDqewz_1lQ1tsuLhQsGzjS4JsbPHYsHSKoVX-vRTQSDZBO2dmqK1_4wH1lVld6DkEXESQp2Pn5VCkfzKuWVeQdHCD-2xGSnkSC8dVJs_cI5PolkS0leAPQs/s1600-h/mg3.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibobUTe5R9eHVpH7REkvJOVDqewz_1lQ1tsuLhQsGzjS4JsbPHYsHSKoVX-vRTQSDZBO2dmqK1_4wH1lVld6DkEXESQp2Pn5VCkfzKuWVeQdHCD-2xGSnkSC8dVJs_cI5PolkS0leAPQs/s320/mg3.png" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWa66BuWMktrUx1HJP7ajAYnIw1tQLZCYiK7XrIvdZqckSk5K8tM5rULT522HIkS7BtBugf-n30VraqIWjTyzLwe1rCoqUHS5qh0uUnIQCz0OeXKE-Izv_LPZM_E-JJgMRRQ3BCERoyzM/s1600-h/mg4.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWa66BuWMktrUx1HJP7ajAYnIw1tQLZCYiK7XrIvdZqckSk5K8tM5rULT522HIkS7BtBugf-n30VraqIWjTyzLwe1rCoqUHS5qh0uUnIQCz0OeXKE-Izv_LPZM_E-JJgMRRQ3BCERoyzM/s320/mg4.png" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEit8HLr1kHlgGf8ZZAvXYQ-MDuw10VVJfaPESkBBW1Tm5V47mUJp4h0mv4AeDJ2VEI0mLagimfvIB8QL7omWGS9hGsno7S4vqLeSJXwWJrkIKkMhZLVnDqgnAKjNd5rm2PgMk4u8XxMehY/s1600-h/mg5.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEit8HLr1kHlgGf8ZZAvXYQ-MDuw10VVJfaPESkBBW1Tm5V47mUJp4h0mv4AeDJ2VEI0mLagimfvIB8QL7omWGS9hGsno7S4vqLeSJXwWJrkIKkMhZLVnDqgnAKjNd5rm2PgMk4u8XxMehY/s320/mg5.png" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXnY-Pd1TEQWf9ho-jnN43goeBan81e0EzziX7U5CrMZ3GijBg-hjO37RtNmA0xgkKhAu-0KsMwS_WUyKtEWC1nzxRb3Cg_JKH9QBkwwR4fPUsMpkJ7yt8tSjt6JIUb1Kcz1iwYSybKhg/s1600-h/mg6.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXnY-Pd1TEQWf9ho-jnN43goeBan81e0EzziX7U5CrMZ3GijBg-hjO37RtNmA0xgkKhAu-0KsMwS_WUyKtEWC1nzxRb3Cg_JKH9QBkwwR4fPUsMpkJ7yt8tSjt6JIUb1Kcz1iwYSybKhg/s320/mg6.png" /></a></div>Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-2556364727435792892008-12-08T13:43:00.000+02:002008-12-08T13:53:19.392+02:00megasztar: donto #8nem volt nagy durranas ez a mai megasztar<br />
<br />
zsuri+kozonseg viszont jol dontott.<br />
<br />
komolyan mondom, par musor inkabb a musorvezetok rol es pl jelen esetben zsuri-rol szol<br />
ugyertem hogy jobban szorakoztat a musorvezeto mint maga a 'musor'<br />
<br />
pl tilla+zsuri vagy vadon jani + balazs stb.<br />
<br />
emberileg davidnak szurkolok, de az az igazsag az hogy viktor megasztarabbEukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-26690270379342113902008-12-03T11:00:00.001+02:002008-12-03T11:08:10.819+02:00whoopi goldberg nagykovet szeretne lenniwhoopi a theview ba, mondta hogy mit szeretne csinalni obama kormanyaba(2008.11.25):<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FDmD5oL432k&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FDmD5oL432k&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br />simonyi andras valaszol neki (2008.11.30):<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hT2mfiQ5gT4&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hT2mfiQ5gT4&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br />whoopi valaszol simonyinak (2008.12.02):<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/N-PRiiZyoVE&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/N-PRiiZyoVE&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-68297322417931077432008-12-01T05:49:00.003+02:002008-12-01T05:57:42.269+02:00asztarok: dontogagyi volt.<br />nem tudom hogy most frei nincs itthon meg? vagy nem volt beleszolasa? vagy nem o "rendezte"? de szinvonaltalan volt az egesz.<br /><br />pl: azzal vaganykodnak hogy LOPTAK? es a fair trade izemize cim a nyeremeny? no comment<br />nezzetek meg a videokat: <a href="http://webcast.tv2.hu/asztarok/">itt</a><br /><br />ennyi. no (more) commentEukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-69687065609801052052008-12-01T05:13:00.007+02:002008-12-01T05:47:51.465+02:00megasztar: donto #7lucy: hat nem tom hogy hogy jutott el idaig, igaz vannak jo "beeneklesei" de annyira nem jo. akar sonnya vagy hien is sokkal jobb volt, bar ez a zsuri hibaja is hogy idaig eljutott, nem mondom hogy x ev mulva nem lehet jo enekes de most meg ne nyerjen ilyesmiket.<br />a) kiss from a rose: babazsurokra mehet vele, de kapcsolat koncertre meg ilyenekre nem<br />b) i will survive: remelem gloria nem keresgel a youtubeon<br /><br />lakatos:<br />a) unchained melody: hat, ha angolul enekli akkor talan jobb lett volna + ha nem emelkedik olyan sokat<br />b) summer in the city: na ez jo volt. maskull errol a szamrol mindig a die hard 3 jut eszembe<br /><br />david:<br />a) szerelem elso verig: teccet<br />b) csokkiraly: jo volt, jo volt, de nagyjabol egyetertek a mesterrel, ez nem david volt hanem egy film<br /><br />viktor:<br />a) careless whispers: mondjuk ugy hogy nem neki valo ez a dal<br />b) billie jean: kb ugyanazt mondhatom mint fent, michael jackson szamhoz michael jackson hang kell.<br /><br />de akarhogy viktor erdemelne meg hogy nyerjen miert?:<br />a) jol tud angolul, ami fontos mivel nem "magyarsztar" a musor cime<br />b) mindent ellehet vele enekeltetni, ami fontos mivel nem "swingsztar" vagy "musicalsztar" a musor cime<br /><br /><iframe src="http://webcast.tv2.hu/dynamic/embed.html?id=386008" class="video" frameborder="0" width="400" height="370"></iframe>Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-79352427747526731372008-11-24T15:34:00.007+02:002008-11-24T17:04:51.459+02:00megasztar: donto #6fekete david a) (manchester england): szar volt, de elvagyok fogulva mivel magyarul volt<br />
tamara a) (everlasting love): kozepes<br />
lucy a) (titaniq): hat, kozepes+<br />
kiraly viktor a) (this love): talan a legjobb volt ma<br />
lakatos a) (new york): jo volt, de semmi fele keppen nem megasztar<br />
<br />
tamara b) (bonnie tyler): ilyen jellegut kellet volna enekelni elejetol kezdve es akar megasztar is lehetett volna, nem minden nepszart<br />
fekete david b) (jatszom): kozepes ala :(<br />
lakatos b) (hound dog): hat kozepeske, jo volt de semmi extra<br />
lucy b) (valami ize): jo volt, o is ilyet kene enekeljen<br />
kiraly viktor b) (enlishman in new york): jo volt bar nekem nem teccet annyira(, kicsit unom mar ezt a szamot)<br />
<br />
tamara kiesese: hat ugymond mar megerdemelte, sokszor volt az utolso kettobe es a zsuri mindig megmentette, mint irtam feljebb ha ezt a bonie tyler felesegeket enekelt volna megnyerhette volna az egeszet. de ugye neki a kissebbseg vonalat kell vinnieEukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-78826803250208193512008-11-17T11:30:00.002+02:002008-11-17T11:30:01.772+02:00megasztar: donto #4nem emlekszek 100% ba h mi volt ezert youtubeon beleneztem az eloadasokba<br />szal rovid leszek:<br />szecsodi: a megszokottnal jobban teljesitette<br />viktor: unalmas<br />lucy: mit ahogy mar aszem en is leirtam es ahogy fridi is mondta (most szombaton is) jo a hangja de az ilyen halk enekelgeteseknel nem jon ki, elvezhetetlen<br />lakatos: jo volt<br />david: o volt a legjobb 'ma'<br />hien: o volt a 2. legjobb<br />tamara: hat megint kepviselte a kissebbseget, nem volt annyira rossz, de eggyet erdek azzal hogy "nem ide valo"Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-76632209479120136862008-11-17T11:30:00.001+02:002008-11-17T11:30:01.431+02:00megasztar: donto #5hat qva szarok voltak a duettek, kiveve:<br />lakatos - david<br />david - dora<br />=> david volt a legjobb ma<br /><br />tamara hanyszor fogja meguszni?<br />komolyan mondom h hiennel vannak sokkal szarabbak! pl: tamara viktor<br />de szerintem lucy nel is eleg sokkal jobbEukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-17850784078447237812008-11-17T11:30:00.000+02:002008-11-17T11:30:01.038+02:00foglalkozasom: celeb / sztarnem tudom egyesek hogy kerulnek be ezekbe a sztaros/celebes musorokba<br />sokat budos eletbe nem lattam, es ezzel nem csak en vagyok igy<br />sokszor nekik all feljebb hogy "ki a fasz <az ismert="" sztar="" celeb="">?"<br /></az>Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-27622945272144675682008-11-04T09:53:00.002+02:002008-11-04T10:31:45.865+02:00a sztarok a fejukre estek premiera margo elott le a kalappal.<br />nem nagyon akarom hasonlitgatni celebvagyok hoz, mivel csak 1 adas volt b) eleg masnak tunik a ket musor.<br /><br />azert eleg ciki hogy guszti nem ugrott le es margo igen<br />mondjuk nekem is van egy teliszonyom szal nem hiszem h akar kozelebb mentem volna a korlathoz... bar sose tudni<br /><br />lemaszas, hat az se adrenalin mentes.<br /><br />ez a masokazas es bungee jumpin' kemenyebb mint a celebvagyok akarmelyik megmerettetese. pl bogar eves: tudod hogy nem lehet bajod mert ugye nem arrol szol az egesz h meg kell olni a celebet, igaz rossz ize van de ugye ki nem erzett mar rossz izt?<br />meglatjuk mi lesz belole.Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-33081364019684443722008-11-04T09:12:00.003+02:002008-11-04T09:53:41.580+02:00megasztar: donto #3ez volt a legszarabb megasztar.<br />tech hibak, szar eneklesek.<br />aki felszeretne eleveniteni:<br /><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PPqKOtp7UxU&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PPqKOtp7UxU&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br />ha valaki csak ez alapjan itelne, eleg rosszul tenne.<br />az osszefoglalo alapjan a legszarabbnak lucy tunik a vinnyogasaval<br /><br />ha jol emlekeszek mar mondtam h tamara enekleseben ez a tulnyujtas vagy hogy fogalmazzak nagyon idegesito szamomra.<br /><br />oszinten karcsi nem tudom mit keres ott!?!?!<br />benne az a legcikibb hogy az anyja halalaval kampanyol.<br />es ez a "feka" beszolasa, nem arrol van szo az en szamat is elhaggyak <span style="font-style: italic;">csunya</span> szavak DE tvbe ilyeneket mondani... mondjuk trilla trilla "felver" szava se nagyon tetszett.<br /><br />hat igen ezzel a meghalt az anyam kampannyal sokmindenkit meglehet fogni.<br /><br />de hogy miert tamara es sonnya maradt?<br />allitolag gaspar 'bekepzelt' laci nyilatkozta azt hogy sonnyaval kapcsolatba h csunyabb es tehetsegtelnebb nem tudom mit nem latott meg. (bumerangba hallotam)<br />es ezert sokan "ellene" szazaztak, mert ugye gaspar 'bekepzelt' laci mar letett valamit az asztalra...<br /><br />hogy a zsuri miert tamarat valasztotta hat ok biztos jobban tudjak, de mar azt tobbszor leszogeztek hogy jol nez ki.. es ez a mai eloadas olyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyan szivhezszolo volt.<br />szerintem sonnya minden tekintetben jobb mint tamara, aki felakarja eleveniteni<br /><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qsVR2KXMEzY&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qsVR2KXMEzY&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br />masreszt mesternek nincs igaza abban hogy ezt a szamot vidam(abban) kell enekelni, ugy latszik csak annyit tud a szambol hogy<br />"No need to run and hide<br />it's a wonderful, wonderful life"<br /><br />en ha keszitenek egy klippet vagy elkepzelem magamba hogy mi tortenik a klipbe, mindenkeppen egy szomorkodo varakozo embert latok.<br /><br />hien megint hatarozottan jobb volt mint lucy, nemtom lucynek a segitoje mindig elqrja ezekkel a hang valtasokkal.<br /><br />magyarok keszen allnak arra hogy a magyar megasztar gyoztese neger vagy pl vietnami legyen? nem tudom, nem hiszem.<br />meglatjuk.<br /><br />ha nagyon belemerulnel a temaba ajanlok egy kis bumerang (vissza) hallgatastEukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-55506993352449669482008-11-01T18:30:00.004+02:002008-11-01T18:58:13.164+02:00opensolaris 2008.11 beta magyarulhupon olvastam hogy opensolaris 2008.05 be nem nagyon volt magyar felulet (hogy en miert nem magyarul hasznalom? az egy masik tortenet lesz)<br />gondoltam megnezem mi a helyzet 1 honappal az ujjabb kiadas elott<br />feltelepitettem <a href="http://www.sun.com/software/products/virtualbox" target="_blank">virtualboxba</a><br />a screenshotok-on vannak korrupcios hibak, de mar kivan javitva lasd <a href="http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4187" target="_blank">#4187</a><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">termeszetesen</span> nincs minden leforditva.<br /><br />ami magyar:<br /><ul><li>gnome</li><li>billentyuzet</li><li>az installer (kiveve a splash kepeket)</li></ul>ami nem magyar -- es jo lenne ha az lenne<br /><ul><li>csomagkezelo</li></ul><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbandyka/2992206882/" title="osol1014 by bbandyka, on Flickr" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3062/2992206882_4ca49fa196.jpg" alt="osol1014" height="409" width="500" /></a><br /><br />aki kivancsi a tobbi screenshotra kattintson <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbandyka/sets/72157608560546338" target="_blank">ide</a>Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-17183457001810305592008-10-28T18:36:00.003+02:002008-10-28T18:44:47.515+02:00toth "omg" gabinem normalis ez a hp.<br /><ul><li>a tetovalast altatas alatt keszitettek?</li><li>a pirszinget is ?</li></ul>mar nehogy jobban belegyen szarva egy doglott kigyotol mint attol hogy szurjak?!?!?!<br /><br />jellemtelen emos alak.Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-77017146852905877582008-10-26T15:13:00.005+02:002008-10-26T16:24:13.403+02:00megasztar: donto #2par szoba a velemenyem a <span style="font-style: italic;">megakrol</span>:<br /><br />lucy: jo hangja van a refrenbe de nem tudom mit csinal a szamok elejen... a multkor is ilyen volt, szerintem xar a hangistja<br /><br />szecsodi "buzi" karcsi: a mester mondhat akarmit de szar ez a style ami "ratja van", es az eneke se meggyozo, persze a nezoket megfogta a halott annyaval es hasonlo dolgaival.<br /><br />sonnya: jo volt.<br /><br />hien: o is (persze meg kell tanuljon)<br /><br />lakatos: jo volt, de igaza van eszenyinek hogy kene mar hanyagolni ezt a cigany vagyok, tovabb kell vinni a hagyomany - dolgot<br /><br />kiraly: nem mondom h nem tud enekelni de ez a szam (when a man lovez a woman) nem neki valo, szal annyira nem jott be<br /><br />david: le a kalappal elotte nagyon jol elenekelte, persze fajt az angol kiejtese de jo volt.<br /><br />tamara: szar volt, es hogy jobban enekel mint az eredeti (katona klari) tobb mint vicces (mester mondta) + az idegesit benne hogy olyanokat enekel amik nem illenek oda, a tulnyujtott hangokra gondolok.<br /><br />pacsirta: amikor enekelt kics nem nagyon teccet, de mikor a vegen a rovid reszeket mutattak rajottem h tevedtem.<br /><br />a nezok szavazatai alapjan<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqqHGHrdJMjO8vMuB6vp53Cn-fnmSBYyIQ-1s4aMKuO0U1nGXv_UE9yXh2qqRvKhkxY567JuxEW5krgDSjnZGmSHknvu599F8bvq6IdNPfPdgFWZ4_Us6MheNJkgGILlwyR3LWoBnZtDs/s1600-h/tama.jpg"><img style="cursor: pointer; width: 100px; height: 80px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqqHGHrdJMjO8vMuB6vp53Cn-fnmSBYyIQ-1s4aMKuO0U1nGXv_UE9yXh2qqRvKhkxY567JuxEW5krgDSjnZGmSHknvu599F8bvq6IdNPfPdgFWZ4_Us6MheNJkgGILlwyR3LWoBnZtDs/s200/tama.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5261455651977358210" border="0" /></a><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1FK1Nh8zYc9f61oTG3DGwH6P2DBxUruP_604bfk96MPzEWjZpuy_jWs8l5r36VnuCwbwqvevgwR2vHDEkiyMPGeKes7QUXdvtiKa47NXppDGaAs5_aHtB2JdNW8Deg05ezzu_WFl5FJU/s1600-h/pacsirta.jpg"><img style="cursor: pointer; width: 100px; height: 78px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1FK1Nh8zYc9f61oTG3DGwH6P2DBxUruP_604bfk96MPzEWjZpuy_jWs8l5r36VnuCwbwqvevgwR2vHDEkiyMPGeKes7QUXdvtiKa47NXppDGaAs5_aHtB2JdNW8Deg05ezzu_WFl5FJU/s200/pacsirta.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5261455651584430578" border="0" /></a><br /><br />tamara es pacsirta kapott a legkevesebb szavazatot.<br />es az <span style="font-weight: bold;">orszag nevelo torveny</span> szerint tamaranak kell tovabbjutnia.<br /><br />hja es az a magyar grease is mi szarEukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-79382895359772509942008-10-19T19:28:00.004+03:002008-10-19T20:00:21.819+03:00megasztar: donto #1ha jol emlekszek, ezelott epp sonnyanak nem "szavazott bizalmat" a zsuri.. vajon miert epp ot engedtek most tovabb imi helyett? mert <a href="http://naplo.sartek.net/2008/10/megasztar-az-orszag-nevelo.html" target="_blank">nevelni</a> akarnak... szerintem fenyonek megmondtak h kit kell kirugni mert nem ugy tunt mintha boldogok lennenek a "dontesukkel"<br /><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbandyka/2954461101/" title="mega2 by bbandyka, on Flickr" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3187/2954461101_c163def4a8_m.jpg" alt="mega2" height="180" width="240" /></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbandyka/2955305426/" title="mega1 by bbandyka, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3293/2955305426_41095b6ce6_m.jpg" alt="mega1" height="180" width="240" /></a><br /><br />ez vanEukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-64228647455681412742008-10-19T19:16:00.002+03:002008-10-19T19:28:24.175+03:00XXL - nem epphat ez vicc... ezzel nem tudom mit akarnak... legrosszabb almomba se felteteleznem hogy a fabry -t akarjak "megverni" ezzel, ez a musor se lesz hosszu eletu.<br />semmi bajom kernel de nem neki valo, igaz mindig mas musorvezeto lesz, de akkor is<br />a baginacsa resz is mar kicsit uncsi volt, ezzel csak azt erik el hogy ekkor is inkabb rtlklubot nez{ek,unk}Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-57140429559132086402008-10-16T13:51:00.002+03:002008-10-16T14:00:58.042+03:00garazsbontasa negyedbe nagy <a href="http://www.szatmar.ro/content/view/16725/70/" target="_blank">munkalatok</a> vannak.<br />mivel a garazsunk nem telejesen volt legalis le kell bontani, ugye van benne par lom, amit en 100% ba kidobnek de anyam csomo mindent megakar tartani, nem tudom miert... pontosabban huje ervei miatt "ez penzbe kerult"... meg maskull is ha eddig nem kellet... ugyanis miota a father meghalt nem nagyon volt matatva benne.. es a kocsi se nagyon volt hasznalva anyam minden evbe azt mondja hogy fog vezeti de mindig elmarad, en eladnam a kocsit is, nincs sok baja, le kell verificaltatni, de megakadalyozza a szar kipufogo, szal csak azt kene megvenni, de meg nem jott ossze meg.<br />anyam hivott valami ismerost h segitsen meg nala lesz a kocsi egy darabig, kerdi tolem h mi lesz.. mondom "ha rajtam mulna..." eleg normalisnak tunik a foszer mivel kiegeszitett "... kidobnad az egeszet" ... hat ha latnatok h mivan sztem ti is igy gondolnatok... nameg ugye azert kell lebontani mert ha nem akkor megbuntetnek...<br />en elvittem volna a kocsit, es hagytam volna hogy menjen neki a florisal a buldozerrelEukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1631257796437560103.post-49656392884774010762008-10-12T04:45:00.005+03:002008-10-12T05:37:08.231+03:00megasztar: az orszag nevelo?a megasztar nyerteseinek "kulonos" ismertetojegyei:<br /><ul><li>toth veronika - kover</li><li>caramel - cigany</li><li>magdi - hatarontuli magyar</li></ul>ki lesz a 4edik megasztar gyoztese?<br /><ul><li>hien ?</li><li>lakatos ?</li><li>sonia ?</li><li>tamara ?</li></ul>az elso elo adas nagyon jol sikerult, igaz az elejet nem lattam mert a celebvagyok-at neztem.<br />nehez a zsuri dolga, de tenyleg<br />mar nem is emlekszek hogy imi mit enekelt de az teccet, nomeg hien es lucy, ha a ket lany kozott kene donteni MOST lucy-re voksolnek, jobb volt ma.<br />remelem holnapra fenn lesz valahol hogy visszahallgassak belole.<br /><br />jo a zsuri is, foleg hogy itt van fridi is. megmondja rendesen de be kell latni igaza van.Eukaryotes prohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09035457470232684510noreply@blogger.com